On February 28, the Dokdo Research Center of the foundation held a symposium with the Dokdo Research Center of Yeungnam University on the theme of 'New Direction in Dokdo Research Explored through Excavation Data.' I made a presentation titled “Ulleungdo and Dokdo in Overseas Records in the 1870s, and the Dajokan (Supreme Council of State) Directives.” I would like to briefly go over the key points of the presentation and the main materials covered.
The international situation surrounding Korea in the 1870s and the Announcement of the Dajokan (Supreme Council of State) Directives
In the 1870s, Korea's international relations were becoming complicated due to issues of each country demarcating their territories. Japan's invasion of Taiwan (May 1874), Sino-Japanese negotiations, the Treaty for the Exchange of Sakhalin for the Kurile Islands between Russia and Japan (July 1875), and the incorporation of the Ogasawara Islands into Japanese territory (1876) took place around this time. Around this time, Korea signed the Korea-Japan Treaty of 1876 (February 1876) and opened its doors after the Japanese warship Unyo invaded and attacked Ganghwa Island illegally.
In Japan, a cadastral survey was carried out in full swing. Shimane Prefecture inquired with the Ministry of Home Affairs, a superior agency, about determining the territory of ‘Takeshima and one other island.’ After reviewing the relevant documents containing the historical records, the Ministry of Home Affairs requested a final judgment from the Supreme Council of State. On March 29, 1877, the Supreme Council of State issued an order declaring, “Keep in mind that Takeshima and one other island have nothing to do with our country.” Here, “Takeshima and one other island” refer to the Ulleungdo and Dokdo Islands. Domestic academic circles have been actively researching how to define the nature of the directive by focusing on the value of the Dajokan Directive.
China-Japan-Russia Operating Regular Routes and Increased Sightings of Ulleungdo Island
Nagasaki was the place where a regular sea route was established in the 1870s, and a lot of information was gathered as it acted as an intermediate port connecting Shanghai of China and Vladivostok of Russia while many people and goods were actively coming and going. It was also a transit area before crossing to Korea. Those who traveled from Nagasaki to Vladivostok frequently witnessed Ulleungdo Island. This led to the submission of petitions by the Japanese people to develop Matsushima Island (Ulleungdo Island). It was an expression of the ambition to take profits through Ulleungdo Island's abundant timber and seafood, and mining products. The desire to pioneer Ulleungdo Island was not exclusive to civilians. The same was true of Hisato Sewaki, who visited Vladivostok in the first half of 1875 and served as a trade secretary in the area from the following year. When traveling between Nagasaki and Vladivostok, they often used the steamship called the Dragon, which regularly traveled to Shanghai, China. Passengers on this ship often witnessed Ulleungdo Island in the East Sea. The story of seeing the island was also carried in the North China Herald, published in Shanghai at the time. An article dated July 15, 1876, illustrates Ulleungdo Island's "rugged rocks and dense slopes" forming "an apparent contrast with the deep blue waters surrounding it." Trade secretary Sewaki mentioned that the UK and Russia were in conflict at the time, and these countries had fixed their eyes on Ulleungdo Island and the northern part of Korea. In the midst of this, he repeatedly emphasized the need for Japan to seize the initiative and start pioneering 'Matsushima Island.'
Initiative for the Development of “Matsushima Island” by the Governor of Nagasaki Prefecture
While Sewaki insisted on pioneering 'Matsushima Island', Hidetomo Kitashima, the governor of Nagasaki Prefecture, also mentioned the necessity of pioneering Matsushima Island' and delivered a specific plan to start the development to Toshimichi Okubo, the Minister of Home Affairs. The documents he sent were 「Inquiries about the Opening of Matsushima Island」 and 「Outline of the Urgent Task of Starting the Development of Matsushima Island」. Kitashima mentioned that Russia and France have their eyes on the island because Ulleungdo Island is a hub on the route between Nagasaki and Vladivostok. He requested that the Ministry of Home Affairs review and promptly approve Nagasaki Prefecture's plan to develop 'Matsushima Island.' The development proposal he attached consisted of 12 plans. There were many similarities with the ‘Matsushima' development plan proposed by Sewaki and other Japanese. As a bureaucrat, he even suggested sending officials from the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Ministry of Industry to manage the pioneering of 'Matsushima Island' and building infrastructures such as a lighthouse.
Okubo Replies that Areas other than Shimane Prefecture Must Also Follow the Dajokan Directives
Minister of Home Affairs Okubo responded to Kitashima on August 18. He investigated documents exchanged between Korea and the Shogunate in the past regarding the inquiries from Shimane Prefecture and decided that the inquiry about the development of ‘Matsushima’ was “not related to our country,” describing how he responded to Shimane Prefecture. The content of this response refers to the Dajokan Directives. Next, Nagasaki Prefecture also wrote, “The purpose of the directives should be observed.” This official document by the Minister of Home Affairs is important in that it is a concrete example of the fact that the Dajokan Directives were also applied to other regions of Japan. This document was obtained by Yoshimoto Hanabusa, who visited Nagasaki before proceeding to his post in Korea. It suggests the possibility that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs also shared the decision of the Ministry of Home Affairs. It is necessary to conduct further investigation and review to see if there are cases where such official messages were sent to places outside Nagasaki.
The user can freely use the public work without fee, but it is not permitted to use for commercial purpose, or to change or modify the contents of public work.